just buy the houses, government dudes!

Here’s my proposal. Let’s spend x-hundred-billion dollars — and I do mean let us because you do know that’s where that future taxpayer money comes from, right? — and just buy the houses from the banks. Pay the remaining principal — I’m even open to paying the difference between equity and fair market value — on the mortgages, and let the banks eat the remaining interest. They’ll have their capital, and rather than taxpayers paying twice — once via the bailout and again via the payments on the mortgages no one can afford — we’ll pay once and own something of concrete value rather than just bad debt. And, the banks will have to figure out their own messes with the capital — and the new oversight restrictions, I’m all for those, especially the salary capping part.

Once the government owns the actual houses, a lot of things could happen. We could reinstate the personal bankruptcy system so that people could declare bankruptcy and move on from those obligations. We could institute a rent-to-own policy with regard to the houses people are in; with a shorter timeframe but no interest, people might actually be able to afford to stay in their homes. We could rent the unoccupied ones to people who needed to downsize from their McMansions. We could bulldoze the vacant McMansions and have government-owned property that could be used for all kinds of exciting things.

My point in all of this is: the possibilities are quite nearly endless, so why are we only talking about a plan where the banks get to keep (1) the money, (2) the houses, and/or (3) the interest income? That seems, well, completely asinine. I’m sure there are nuances of the agreement that I’m missing; I’m actually not at all sure of that, but consider this is the I’m-just-talking-and-MBA-blather-is-not-welcome-at-the-moment warning flag. Really, though: could we please just delay this a few months until the executive branch is run by people who are not complete [fill in the blank with your favorite expletive]s? I am sure there are lots of creative solutions out there, and if the government can not just keep the airlines in business by massive tax subsidies but also own the physical airplanes that they lease, surely we can calmly and rationally consider the benefits of actually owning the properties in question without getting ourselves all in a twitch? Empty land would probably be quite a bit preferable to empty houses, for reasons that I’m sure the community groups who protested the developments from the beginning would be glad to share with us.

At the very least, can we next time nationalize something valuable like oil, or gas, or minerals? Please?

just buy the houses, government dudes!

skip the pig next time and go back to basics

Senator Obama, I offer you this suggestion from over here at Free Advice Central: next time, stick with reminding voters that you can’t polish a turd. This may sound a bit too, well, Rhode-Island-ish to you, but I believe it will get the message across while not mistaking the target and will appeal to the common sense of voters all across the nation. Best of all, the phrase is flexible and can be applied in a wide variety of situations. For example: McCain? Turd. Bush? Turd. Palin? Turd. Any combination of their atrocious policies? Turd. The idea that pandering to women by throwing a fellow vagina our way will get McCain into the White House? Turd supreme, but they are polishing it like crazy.

Not everyone grew up in a place where you had to breathe through your tshirt while driving down certain roads with the wind blowing just wrong, so it might be hard to understand just how little lipstick would do for the appearance of a pig, intelligent and friendly creatures though they may be. Turds, though, everybody gets.

skip the pig next time and go back to basics

being a community organizer

I have been struggling to get beyond the insults slung by the Republicans two nights ago, but it’s been hard. Before I was a college grad or a law student or a college teacher, I was a community organizer. Not just through volunteering and provision of service sense, but also through the mobilizing people for political action and agitating for resources. Like most people who do this kind of work, organizing is more than just a task or a strategy, its an integral part of my sense of how people in a community address serious problems and get governments and corporations to be responsive to our needs.

I want to tell you a story about the last time I worked as a community organizer. Seven years ago, I was a volunteer organizer with my graduate student union. There was nothing particularly special about my role: I didn’t hold an elected office in the union, I wasn’t on the bargaining team, and I wasn’t one of the two paid organizers. I was a member, a steward, and a volunteer. During the last year I was in grad school, our contract came up for renewal, as it did every three years. Ours was an old union, established in the 1970s, and as such had secured decent wages, tuition remission, and health coverage for most of the people in its bargaining unit. We were going to have to build a bargaining platform around less standard issues, those that pushed the envelope in terms of contractually-guaranteed union benefits: dental care and health care for part-time workers, paid job training, and child care. Of all of these, subsidized child care was the piece that seemed the most dicey; the administration was extremely hostile to the idea and while there were a lot of graduate student parents in the bargaining unit, they were among the least involved as union members, no doubt because of the additional demands on their time and energy.

I can clearly remember when the union decided to take on the child care issue. Several of us went up to family housing on a weekend afternoon and went door to door in order to find out whether graduate student parents would be willing to get behind the union pushing for subsidized child care. Of the many conversations I had that day, one stands out. I ended up at the house of a woman I already knew, a friend of a friend of mine in law school and someone who had been fairly vocally opposed to the union in the past. I’m pretty sure that if she didn’t know me as a friend of another grad student parent she trusted, I never would have gotten in the door. She did invite me in, though, and we talked about the union and about child care, and she said to me, ‘I would love it if the union got us child care, but it’s been on the platform before and they’ve given it up during bargaining. Those of us who are parents have worked our butts off for this in the past, only to have it taken off the table in exchange for other things, and I’ve told people not to trust the union because of that experience. If you can tell me that the union is not going to ditch us at the last minute, I will work for you on this issue.‘ I looked her in the eye and I told her that things would be different this time around: if she would mobilize graduate student parents to support us, we would not let her down.

Like I said, I was not an officer of the union. I wasn’t in charge of the platform. Arguably, I had no ability to make promises on behalf of the union. However, I could make a commitment of my own, and the commitment I made was to take up the role given to me, to work with union leadership to make child care an integral part of the platform, which we did. I can’t take credit for the mobilization of graduate student parents; there were other organizers who worked exclusively on this issue during the months to follow and numerous parents who made calls and distributed fliers and attended bargaining meetings. I certainly didn’t do it all, but I did my part, the part that hinged upon demonstrating that the union could be held to its word, and that I as an organizer would do everything I could to earn that trust. I went to meetings. I made signs. I backed up those in the union who insisted that the child care platform stay on the table until the very end. And at the very end — in the middle of the night, in a conference room at the university, with an exhausted bargaining team, a stonewalling administration, and nothing left on the table but child care — I helped the other organizers call those same parents to come to campus, leaving their sleeping kids at home, so that we all would know who we were really accountable to. Those parents were the community we purported to represent, and when the administration team saw that we would sit there all night before we would go back on our promise to fight for them, they caucused and came back with an offer for child care subsidies that we accepted.

That’s one part of what it means to be an organizer, the part that involves building the trust that allows you to call on someone in the middle of the night to come out and fight for the things that are important to the community. Another part of being a community organizer is more personal and harder to quantify. During that same campaign, political tensions were running high. The World Trade Center had been attacked, the United States had invaded Afghanistan, and Arab-American communities in nearby Dearborn were being targeted with violence. While we were working to unify our community around the bargaining platform we were also enduring bitter arguments between members about responses to the war. One of our most outspoken union members was a guy on the political right who was also a parent. I hadn’t met him in person, only communicated with him over email, when I ended up at an organizing event to which parents brought their children to make posters for one of our large membership meetings. As it happened, I came to be working on a poster with this guy’s young son. As we were working, he started to talk about the World Trade Center, about hearing that people had been hurt and died. And then he asked me a series of questions: Why did the building fall? Were any children hurt? Could that happen again? There I was, with not just someone else’s child but the child of a person I knew did not at all share my ideology, having no idea what had already been said in their household. I didn’t want to contradict anything he’d been told, but I didn’t want to leave his questions just hanging out there. So I told him that the building collapsing was very unusual. Most buildings didn’t collapse, even when things like earthquakes happened. He didn’t need to worry about this building, or any of the buildings he was in. They were all very safe and very well-built. Sometimes bad things just happen, and it’s really sad when people get hurt and when people die, and I didn’t think that any children had been hurt. He listened intently, agreed with me that it was a sad thing, and we moved on to finish the task at hand.

When I got home late that night, I emailed his father. I told him that his son had asked me these questions, and what I had said. I told him that I tried to assure his son that there was no risk of other buildings falling down, that I hoped I did not overstep my role in that situation, and that I had not wanted to simply say nothing. About ten minutes after I sent the email, my phone rang (graduate students don’t sleep!). It was him, thanking me through tears for talking with his son. He was a structural engineer, he told me (I didn’t know that), and he had been crying a lot at their house (I didn’t know that), grieving not just for the loss of life but also out of shock at the destruction involved in the collapse of the buildings themselves. He hadn’t known that his son had picked up on the sense that buildings weren’t supposed to do that, or that he had been hearing about the deaths outside of their home. We talked for maybe 20 minutes that night, but it was the first time we had had a real conversation, and it wasn’t about the union: it was about life. In the weeks that followed, he became the steward of his department and organized more engineers to support us. Three months later, he was one of the parents who showed up late at night to shore up our presence at the bargaining table. Not because we persuaded him to a particular political view — although I’d be curious to know what he makes of today’s politics — but because I and the other organizers demonstrated through all of our actions that we were committed to improving the lives of our members.

I am confident that every organizer in this country has stories like mine. Every organizer goes out on a limb at one point or another, commits to something they’re not sure they can deliver, and then works to make it happen. Every organizer makes connections based on our shared life experiences and not just on our political views. When people can see that you genuinely care about their well-being — their families, their children — that’s when they know they can trust you to fight on their behalf. That trust is what makes all the difference.

being a community organizer

Who will drive your voters to the polls, John McCain?

Beyond being pretty bottom-of-the-barrel as a critique, someone in the GOP has to realize that attacking community organizers is just plain stupid, right? Yes, it’s true that community organizers achieve a lot that’s counter to the GOP platform. They get child care, health care, and retirement benefits for workers. They protect the rights of tenants against slumlords. They block efforts to drill or mine or pave natural areas. They keep books from being banned and librarians from being fired. They escort women into and out of clinics and educate young people about contraception. They exchange needles and advocate for more HIV/AIDS research and education. They work to ensure the health and safety of the people who harvest our crops and slaughter our farm animals. I can see how the GOP would be happy if these folks all dropped off the face of the planet.

It does, however, seem more than a bit callous for Republicans to insult the life work of so many other organizers in communities that support them. I mean, all that stuff that goes on in church basements? Community organizing. Feeding people who are hungry, sheltering people who are homeless, getting flu shots for those who need them, and teaching folks of all ages to read? That’s all community organizing. Now, it may be that the GOP is getting hung up on linguistics, seeing the provision of all of these things as community service. But the people who make it all happen — who call the volunteers, book the halls, buy the food and the clothes and the shampoo and the books, and most importantly of all identify the needs? Those folks are the community organizers, and it’s not at all clear what the Republicans have against them.

It’s especially unclear with regard to the base that McCain and Palin are looking to mobilize, because those folks are some of the best organizers around. Demonstrating outside funerals? Community organizing. Screaming at people on the sidewalks outside of clinics while waving plastic fetuses? Community organizing. Blocking initiatives to provide equal rights to same-sex partners? Community organizing. Getting religion into public school textbooks and curricula? Community organizing. Most importantly of all for John McCain, registering voters and driving people to the polls on election day? Community organizing.

But, you heard them: community organizing is a joke. So, I have this to say to loyal and hard-working Republicans in towns across the country: come November, why don’t you stay home, put your feet up, and let the mayor do the driving.

Who will drive your voters to the polls, John McCain?